[GRLUG] VMWare ESXi Was: Raid, LVM, and Cheap Storage
Ben DeMott
ben.demott at gmail.com
Tue Oct 14 15:11:40 EDT 2008
My Former employer did the same thing, diddo on the VMWare Server
Experiences.
For those that have not gone down the virtualization road -
Beware Exchange 2000 servers, Exchange Mail Stores without SP2, Domain
Controllers, and Conversion!
VMware Converter had a bug prior to version 3.01 - in which it corrupted the
network stack/winsock.
Once the conversion was done the damage could not be reversed - so beware.
The problem shows up more on Linux hosts, your network adapter (only when
loaded) will appear to go from maximum throughput to ~10kb/s over and over
again several times a second.
All of our virtual machines were built from scratch - Mostly from paranoia.
Microsoft originally stated they would be supporting Linux as a guest
operating system (but they didn't), I'm not sure what their current
hypervisor offerings are - and what memory limitations are for their free
products. If they would have only supported Linux as a
guest, or allowed for more memory on the host I would have been open minded
- anyone using Microsoft Virtualization?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Adam Tauno Williams <
adamtaunowilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 14:41 -0400, Ben Rousch wrote:
> > > And if you want more hardware support (at the cost of lower
> > > performance), you can always use the standard VMware Server product
> > > that runs on top of most Linux distro's.
> > > I believe they just released version 2.0 of the standard VMware
> > > Server. I run XP in VMware Server version 1 at home on top of Ubuntu
> > > 8.04, and it works fine. Never tried v2, except for one of the early
> > > beta releases, which I never got to run at all.
> > Just today I installed VMWare Server 2 on one of my Ubuntu 8.04
> > computers at work. The web-based (via FF plugin) Virtualization
> > Manager is very different from v1, but it is running well.
>
> I used VMware Server v1 for production servers up until we got ESX
> (which we did about a two weeks before it became free!). It worked
> reasonably well; it was slower than ESX and it often 'leaked' when you
> created/released snapshots. It didn't remove the snapshot files, so
> some of the VMs got really big over time.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shinobu.grlug.org/pipermail/grlug/attachments/20081014/76721ec8/attachment.htm
More information about the grlug
mailing list