[GRLUG] Co-location hosting in or near GR/Muskegon

Mike Williams knightperson at zuzax.com
Sun Feb 13 18:49:55 EST 2011


I'm curious. Why insist on colocating your own hardware at that kind of 
price when you can rent a virtual machine from a cloud provider like 
Amazon's S3 much more cheaply? Is there some specialized hardware on the 
machines that can't be virtualized, or maybe security fears?

On 02/13/2011 04:30 PM, Clay Ashby wrote:
> I'm interested in the details. I'm planning on doing some hosting 
> services in the future. Is this purely for redundancy; like a "hot 
> site"? Is it for hosting websites redundantly, or other services as well?
>
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Bruce Smith <blubdog at gmail.com 
> <mailto:blubdog at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > I was wondering if anyone of you knew of any decently priced
>     co-location
>     > hosting in the Grand Rapids or Muskegon area. The need is
>     non-commercial so
>     > price is a BIG factor, but I would be willing to pay if the
>     price is right.
>     > If you want more details on my needs, feel free to ask.
>
>     I'm in Kalamazoo and a couple years ago we searched for a nearby
>     co-location facility that is cheap.  We searched Kalamazoo, Grand
>     Rapids, Lansing, and other areas within a driving distance of
>     Kalamazoo.
>
>     Most were in the $400/month range, which is what was more that we
>     wanted to pay.  The closest thing we found that was "cheap", was a
>     place in South Bend IN. who's equivalent price was $70/month.  It was
>     a farther drive for us (and even farther for you), but we went with
>     them and it's worked out okay so far.  It's nothing fancy (kinda dumpy
>     actually).  Just an old building in an old part of town, with cheap
>     racks in a large room.  But they had good bandwidth, power backup and
>     A/C.  Definitely a budget shop, and their prices reflect it
>     significantly.
>
>     Let me know if you want more info.
>
>      - BS
>
>     --
>     This message has been scanned for viruses and
>     dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>     believed to be clean.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     grlug mailing list
>     grlug at grlug.org <mailto:grlug at grlug.org>
>     http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- "technologically promiscuous"
>
>
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shinobu.grlug.org/pipermail/grlug/attachments/20110213/e6dead41/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the grlug mailing list