mikemol at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 08:55:24 EDT 2014
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
<awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 15:08 -0400, Mark Farver wrote:
>> I think it is a stretch to label this remotely exploitable.
> Ditto. This is a theoretical exploit of a system that has issues.
I'd like to hear your explanation of this. Why would a system have to
have "issues" for this to be exploitable? (Outside of the obvious that
it's running a vulnerable version of bash.)
More information about the grlug