[GRLUG] top-end wireless routers

Richard Nienhuis richardnienhuis at gmail.com
Thu May 26 22:55:07 EDT 2011


If you don't mind plucking down a bit more coin, mikrotik.com has
decent products that you can customize how you want.

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using a couple ASUS WL-330gEs, and I *love* them. However, I'm
> just using them as bridges, plugged into a Linux router. Want to know
> who's hogging all the bandwidth? Log into the Linux box, run 'iftop -i
> eth1' or some such. You might also run 'ntop' on it, if you want
> longer-term stats.
>
> I've had up to a dozen or so active clients, but never tried the 20-50
> you're talking about. I imagine that operating them in wireless bridge
> mode would leave the load considerations for your dedicated router,
> which sounds like something you need to start doing anyway...
>
> However, they only go up to 802.11g, so if 802.11n is a necessity, it
> won't get there for you. ASUS's other products are significantly
> lacking in the firmware department, and I don't know if it's
> worthwhile for you, in a production environment, to poke around with
> loading custom firmwares on them.
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Dave Brondsema <dave at brondsema.net> wrote:
>> I'm looking for a good wireless router that is better than
>> consumer-grade.  Here at The Factory (downtown coworking location) the
>> wifi routers we've tried haven't been able to hold up under load.  I'd
>> like to find something that can handle 20-50 clients well.  And of
>> course each client could have quite a few open connections, some may
>> stream video, skype, etc.
>>
>> As a bonus, I'd like a good management interface so if there is someone
>> seriously hogging all the bandwidth, it's easy to identify that directly.
>>
>> What do you folks recommend?
>>
>> --
>> Dave Brondsema : dave at brondsema.net
>> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
>> http://www.splike.com : programming
>>              <><
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> grlug mailing list
>> grlug at grlug.org
>> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>>
>
>
>
> --
> :wq
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the grlug mailing list