[GRLUG] booting from iscsi target
Mike Williams
knightperson at zuzax.com
Tue Dec 27 18:17:08 EST 2011
It's supposed to be possible with PXE, but I haven't gotten that far. So
far, I can't even get an iSCSI initiator to connect to and mount an
iscsi target even when there are fully functional operating systems
involved. I intend to keep playing with it because it's neat stuff.
On 12/27/2011 07:54 AM, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
> I'm the one who was talking about booting Windows over iSCSI. Sorry
> for the delayed response, I haven't been checking the mailing list as
> much as I probably should for the last couple of weeks.
>
> Anyway, the only way I've made this work is to use an iSCSI option ROM
> for an Intel gigabit NIC. All you need to do is set the iSCSI target
> (including LUN) in the NIC's setup screen (Ctrl-A at boot, I think)
> and then through the magic of iBFT the Windows installer will present
> the iSCSI target in the list of installable drives and happily install
> directly to it. Then, you select the NIC as the primary boot device in
> the system BIOS and it boots just fine with no local disks.
>
> I'm not sure it is possible to do this without at least iBFT support
> on the NIC, so you will need some dedicated hardware. But, Intel NICs
> are ~$20 and you can download the iSCSI ROM for them here:
>
> http://downloadcenter.intel.com/default.aspx
>
> It's trivial to make a FreeDOS boot USB drive, and run BootUtil from
> there to update the ROM on the NIC. At least it went smoothly for me.
>
> You can also check into iPXE if you don't have an Intel card (or even
> if you do) but I had better luck with the official Intel ROM on my card.
>
> Good luck with this.
>
> -Kevin
>
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Mike Williams <knightperson at zuzax.com
> <mailto:knightperson at zuzax.com>> wrote:
>
> I've played around with it, but haven't gotten anything working.
> The iscsi initiator (Windows 7) will recognize and connect to an
> iscsi target (sometimes Ubuntu, sometimes Windows 2008), but I
> can't seem to actually attach to a LUN. I'm not interested in
> performance or dedicated hardware at this point; I just want to
> establish that you can run a diskless workstation over iscsi.
>
>
> On 12/23/2011 10:19 AM, scott.tanner at comcast.net
> <mailto:scott.tanner at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Hey Mike,
> Did you ever get the information you were looking for on this?
>
> I have a little experience with an iscsi arrays, and lab'd up
> a test environment using the Linux Target framework (tgt) on
> one (beefy) server and the iscsi-initiator software on a few
> clients. My setup was a little different as it's CentOS/Xen
> based, but most of the design principles would be the same.
>
> Added warning - not all ISCSI systems are created equal!
> Sadly my test environment GREATLY outperformed the Infortrend
> ISCSI array we purchased, averaging around %40 better
> performance for read/write block I/O (bonnie++). After a
> growth spurt in our QA department which doubled the VM count,
> the ISCSI system was demoted to bulk storage and a new
> SAS-based SAN was just purchased. I've been told by some
> storage specialists that many providers tweak the ISCSI
> controllers for better throughput, apparently Infortrend does not.
>
>
> Regards,
> Scott
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From: *"Mike Williams" <knightperson at zuzax.com
> <mailto:knightperson at zuzax.com>>
> *To: *"Grand Rapids Linux Users Group" <grlug at grlug.org
> <mailto:grlug at grlug.org>>
> *Sent: *Tuesday, December 20, 2011 2:48:02 AM
> *Subject: *[GRLUG] booting from iscsi target
>
>
> I remember somebody on the list or at The Warehouse was doing
> this.
> Whoever you are, can I pick your brain on duplicating that
> feat? I'm
> want to get a Virtualbox Windows 7 guest to boot, first from
> the host
> Ubuntu 11.10 but eventually from a guest Windows 2008, to
> prove to my
> employer that Windows 7 will run happily disklessly.
>
> I'm trying to learn about five new things at once here, and my
> brain is
> overflowing!
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org <mailto:grlug at grlug.org>
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner*
> <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org <mailto:grlug at grlug.org>
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org <mailto:grlug at grlug.org>
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the grlug
mailing list