[GRLUG] What are the notable LUGs in the state?

[Michael Mol]

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Adam Tauno Williams
<awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 15:37 -0400, Ben Rousch wrote:
>> I have heard of these two:
>> MUG: Michigan!/usr/group
>> http://www.mug.org/twiki/bin/view/Mugwiki/WebHome
>> GLLUG: Greater Lansing Linux Users Group
>> http://gllug.org/
>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I know of GRLUG and WMLUG, but what other LUGs are there in the state
>> > with an active membership of 10 or more?
>
> Define "active"?  I would not be surprised at a all if that number [of
> LUGs] is zero.  Does WMLUG average more than 10 attendees at a meeting?
> It might be close.

Participants in any related social context. In GRLUG, I'd count the
mailing list, structured meetings like the ones Casey puts together,
the Saturday Socials, the IRC channel (not really counting lurkers).
By that definition, GRLUG qualifies as Active several times over. :)


>
> The halcyon days of the LUG have clearly passed; in part [I believe]
> because they succeeded:  LINUX is now mainstream.
>
> --
> Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> LPIC-1, Novell CLA
> <http://www.whitemiceconsulting.com>
> OpenGroupware, Cyrus IMAPd, Postfix, OpenLDAP, Samba
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>



-- 
:wq

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.