[GRLUG] FOR SALE - 16-Cores, 128GB RAM, 3.2TB, RAID, 2xFX4500 Graphics

Bob Kline bob.kline at gmail.com
Sat Jul 25 00:20:07 EDT 2009


OK.  I've never used Gentoo, but
thought one of the motivations for
doing so was that you compiled it
for your specific processor, and got
some kind of performance bump.

I do use Ubuntu, and upgrades of one
sort or another come along regularly.
But the packages are generic, and all
one sees is "i386" or some kind of 64-bit
package, and doesn't get whatever
optimization might occur by compiling
for your exact CPU.

One can of course download tar-balls,
and build and install them to get the
latest of something.  I used to do this
with GNU packages, but it just doesn't
seem worth the bother any more unless
it's for serious bug fixes.  But Ubuntu
does that anyway.  Maybe a short while
later.

That I can see, if one wants more
performance, buy higher performance
hardware.  Even trying to optimize
compile code can only take one a little
ways in terms of performance increases.
That I can tell, the other reason for
upgrading is usually bug fixes, and, more
rarely, improved features.

   -- Bob


On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol at gmail.com> wrote:

> I didn't arrange for any meaningful benchmarks.  I don't really think
> there is such a thing, either.
>
> My two big reasons for using Gentoo are the incremental upgrade
> philosophy (no apt-get dist-upgrade every six months, no reinstall of
> a new annual release), and that I often need to be on the bleeding
> edge versions when I do thinks like media processing.
>
> I did blog on the subject about a week ago:
> http://mmol-6453.livejournal.com/144877.html
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Bob Kline<bob.kline at gmail.com> wrote:
> > How much faster do you find things
> > run by doing a compile on your own?
> >
> >    -- Bob
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Mike Mol <mikemol at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been using Gentoo lately. A whole-OS recompile takes about eight
> >> hours over-night on dodo. That thing makes me lust a bit...
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Casey DuBois <casey at grlug.org>
> >> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 3:33 PM
> >> To: grlug at grlug.org
> >> Subject: Re: [GRLUG] FOR SALE - 16-Cores, 128GB RAM, 3.2TB, RAID,
> 2xFX4500
> >>      Graphics
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Rob Steenwyk<rsteenwyk at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > How do you just receive this kind of thing? Was it for work and now it
> >> > isn't
> >> > needed? Regardless, that is awesome!
> >> >
> >> > Rob Steenwyk
> >> > rsteenwyk at gmail.com
> >> > 616-723-0226
> >> >
> >>
> >> System was a lease return that came in with a large batch of storage
> >> and switches, not sure how much it was used as it is VERY clean inside
> >> and has not had the protective coating removed from the case.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> grlug mailing list
> >> grlug at grlug.org
> >> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> grlug mailing list
> >> grlug at grlug.org
> >> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > grlug mailing list
> > grlug at grlug.org
> > http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
> >
>
>
>
> --
> :wq
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://shinobu.grlug.org/pipermail/grlug/attachments/20090725/d4d5351b/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the grlug mailing list