[GRLUG] PCI v1.2 Compliance.

[Greg Folkert]

On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 18:29 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> be wrned, my reply is long and could have been orders of magnitude
> longer.
> 
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:05 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 15:21 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > All I can say it *IT SUCKS*.
> > 
> > Actually I think PCI is a pretty good standard.  I think 98% of the
> > recommendations are solid/good practices.   And it makes a nice club to
> > beat good security practices into an organization.
> 
[snip lotsa stuff]

Any comments from anyone? Or insight? Or contrarian thoughts? Or flames?

I'd have really thought many people would feel this... or at least have
more comments than from the regular peanut gallery.
-- 
greg at gregfolkert.net
PGP key 1024D/B524687C 2003-08-05
Fingerprint: E1D3 E3D7 5850 957E FED0  2B3A ED66 6971 B524 687C
Alternate Fingerprint: 09F9 1102 9D74  E35B D841 56C5 6356 88C0
Alternate Fingerprint: 455F E104 22CA  29C4 933F 9505 2B79 2AB2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://shinobu.grlug.org/pipermail/grlug/attachments/20081211/ac2991b7/attachment-0001.pgp