Thanks Mike. I knew from the GRLUG<div>meets that you were satisfied with the</div><div>NOOK. The limitation look painful, but</div><div>then it's not clear yet how the Kindle </div><div>fares. I imagine they will all get better,</div>
<div>but one gets older waiting too....</div><div><br></div><div> -- Bob</div><div><br><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Michael Mol <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mikemol@gmail.com">mikemol@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Bob Kline <<a href="mailto:bob.kline@gmail.com">bob.kline@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110519/tc_afp/usitcompanybooksinternetkindleamazon" target="_blank">http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20110519/tc_afp/usitcompanybooksinternetkindleamazon</a><br>
> Apparently the crossover point of more<br>
> digital than paper books has been crossed<br>
> at Amazon.<br>
> I'm seriously thinking of getting a unit now.<br>
> Two questions:<br>
> * Does one have unlimited access to a<br>
> digital version? i.e., if I want to reference<br>
> a book three years later, will I be able to?<br>
> I'm really looking for an online library.<br>
> * I know that GRLUG members have both<br>
> the Amazon and the Barnes and Nobel<br>
> readers. I'd appreciate comments about<br>
> the pros and cons of each. Amazon claims<br>
> it has 950K digital books now. I don't know<br>
> what the corresponding figure for B&N is,<br>
> but that would be a factor too.<br>
> -- Bob<br>
<br>
</div></div>Using a B&N Nook (not the color one). Haven't purchased any protected<br>
e-books from Amazon, BN or anywhere else, so I can't speak to that.<br>
Right now, the Nook is loaded with six or seven DRM-free ebooks I<br>
purchased from O'Reilly.<br>
<br>
Pros:<br>
* I'm very happy with it.<br>
* It's great for reading in bed in the early dawn hours. As the<br>
ambient light level increases, I decrease the font size so I can see<br>
more on the screen.<br>
* It's also nice and quiet, and doesn't disturb the SO's slumber. (I<br>
tried reading paper book in the morning a couple weeks ago, and she<br>
suggested I go back to reading on the Nook. :) )<br>
* Battery life is incredible. I can forget to charge it for weeks.<br>
* Operates very well on ambient light.<br>
<br>
Cons:<br>
* Depending on the book, bookmarks and tables of contents can be of<br>
varying utility.<br>
* There's no "jump forward fifteen pages. Now do it again. And again.<br>
Jump back to where you just jumped from", so it's not that easy to<br>
seek around manually if the TOC is uninformative.<br>
* Browser is mostly useless. It'd be handy if the keyboard wasn't<br>
horrible, but, well...<br>
* Softkey keyboard is very slow, to the point of painful, and it's not<br>
a question of my dexterity.<br>
* keyword searching in a book hampered by the high cost of typos or of<br>
using the wrong keyword. (keyboard slow, searching slow, page load<br>
slow if you're only going to be on the page for a half second before<br>
moving on...)<br>
<br>
I've handled B&N color nooks, and have a couple things to say about them.<br>
* Battery life is much lower than the black-and-white nook.<br>
* Will not operate well under low-light environment without a backlight.<br>
* The screen interface for flipping back and forth between pages is<br>
*very* fast, intuitive and comfortable(imagine a touchscreen on top of<br>
fbreader. It'd be kinda like that)<br>
* The wifi wizard will not connect to networks with an apostrophe in<br>
the name. I think there's some poor quoting somewhere in its internal<br>
scripts. This means you won't be able to connect to a network named,<br>
for example, "Joe's Apartment"<br>
<br>
I've seen the Amazon Kindle, but I don't recall handling it.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
:wq<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
This message has been scanned for viruses and<br>
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is<br>
believed to be clean.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
grlug mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:grlug@grlug.org">grlug@grlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug" target="_blank">http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
<br />--
<br />This message has been scanned for viruses and
<br />dangerous content by
<a href="http://www.mailscanner.info/"><b>MailScanner</b></a>, and is
<br />believed to be clean.