<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Bob Kline <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bob.kline@gmail.com">bob.kline@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Steve Romanow <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:slestak989@gmail.com" target="_blank">slestak989@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Im actually going the other way. Cut both my tv and net to "economy"<br>
tier from Comcast. 1M net and 20 channels. ~$40/month. Works for me,<br>
just won't be downloading any iso's from home :)</blockquote></div><div><br>Probably the sensible direction.<br><br>Given what's (not) on TV today, you<br>could probably do as well with a 765 Kbps<br>DSL link and save even more....<br>
<br> -- Bob<br><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br>We have the 768K DSL from ATT and Comcast's barebones cable (15 channels?). With a TiVo recording anything interesting, we always TV to watch and most of the time downloads aren't too painful. However, it does get slow if my wife and I are both watching YouTube videos at the same time. <br>
</div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> Ben Rousch<br> <a href="mailto:brousch@gmail.com">brousch@gmail.com</a><br> <a href="http://ishmilok.blogspot.com/">http://ishmilok.blogspot.com/</a><br> <a href="http://tech-ishmilok.blogspot.com/">http://tech-ishmilok.blogspot.com/</a><br>