<br><br><p><DEFANGED_div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 16, 2007 1:21 AM, Tim Schmidt <<a href="mailto:timschmidt@gmail.com">timschmidt@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" DEFANGED_style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<p><DEFANGED_div class="Ih2E3d">On Nov 16, 2007 1:16 AM, Michael Mol <<a href="mailto:mikemol@gmail.com">mikemol@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Heh. It could start hurting even more. Apparently they're getting<br>> close to implementing swap over NFS. It's intended for diskless
<br>> cluster environments, but it still stands to complicate performance<br>> issues. Sub-optimal performance? Do you have a bad network cable, or<br>> are your jobs eating too much memory?<br><br></p><DEFANGED_div>Swap over NFS has worked for years... LTSP has (optionally) supported
<br>it for ages.<br><font color="#888888"><br>--tim<br></font></blockquote><p><DEFANGED_div><br>If it's a real file system it would<br>seem to be a given that one could<br>have a swap file on it. In the days<br>when NFS couldn't handle swap,
<br>if there were such days, what were<br>the issues? Speed? Possible network<br>congestion?<br><br> -Bob<br><br></p><DEFANGED_div></p><DEFANGED_div><br>