No Lafanda was, hands down, the better politician!<br><br><p><DEFANGED_div><DEFANGED_span class="gmail_quote">On 9/1/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Bob Kline</b> <<a href="mailto:bob.kline@gmail.com">bob.kline@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</DEFANGED_span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" DEFANGED_style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">My apologies. This was sent by mistake.<br><br>No more replies please.<br><br> -Bob<br><br>
<br>On 9/1/06, Benjamin Eavey <<a href="mailto:ben@eavey.com">ben@eavey.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Don't we have a rule about political discussions on the GRLUG list? As<br>> in, perhaps they shouldn't take place here?
<br>><br>> If we don't have that rule, we probably should. I get enough political<br>> emails in my Inbox, thanks. This is a LUG.<br>><br>> My 2 cents.<br>><br>> -Ben<br>><br>><br>> Bob Kline rašė:
<br>> > I"ve watched a few election "debates"<br>> > on C-Span. Why is it that the news<br>> > people asking the questions will always<br>> > bring up tax cuts, but never ask whether
<br>> > some spending could be curtailed?<br>> > Everything is geared toward making tax<br>> > cuts look unreasonable.<br>> ><br>> > Maybe because 90% of news people<br>> > admit to being Dems? Gosh, I wonder....
<br>> ><br>> > -Bob<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> grlug mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:grlug@grlug.org">grlug@grlug.org</a><br>> <a href="http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug">
http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>grlug mailing list<br><a href="mailto:grlug@grlug.org">grlug@grlug.org</a><br><a href="http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug">
http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug</a><br></blockquote></p><DEFANGED_div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>In vino veritas.<br> [In wine there is truth.]<br> -- Pliny