<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I was going to mention that as well... I wind up doing that in gui text
editors LOL... At least its easy to find in code. They tell you what
line you did it on! :D<br>
<br>
john-thomas richards wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid20060811192633.GA18481@jrichards.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:05:16PM -0400, Al Tobey wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 8/11/06, Michael Mol <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mikemol@gmail.com"><mikemol@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">But that feels like breaking away from the ed syntax that makes :wq
(or :x) comfortable and intuitive in vi. :)
On the pless side, it only takes two fingers on a QWERTY keyboard.
(And yes, I just called ed syntax intuitive.)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Why be ashamed? At least your not one of those Emacs people ...
they're "different" from us ;)
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
They sure are! We do not need to run Emacs because we already have an
operating system...
ba-dump ch.
Having to run Windows at work, I sometimes find myself typing this:
[ESC]:x
[ESC]:x
(hmm...)
[ESC][ESC]:x
(hmmm.....)
Oh. Drat. This is *Outlook*, not vim...
:-)
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>