[GRLUG] GR area ISPs

Bob Kline bob.kline at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 20:06:30 EST 2010


Not bad.  What is your nominal speed?

i.e., what are you paying for?

U-verse is not available everywhere.
Not in my area, and I'm in GR.

    -- Bob


On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Joseph Workman <joseph.workman at gmail.com>wrote:

> I have sustained download speed of around 1024kB's
> and the speakeasy test put me at:
> Download Speed: *11459* kbps (1432.4 KB/sec transfer rate)
> Upload Speed: *1468* kbps (183.5 KB/sec transfer rate)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Bob Kline <bob.kline at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What are GREAT speeds?
>>
>> Do you ever use http://www.speedtest.net/ or
>> http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/ ?
>>
>> If so, try it early in the morning - like 4:30AM.
>> Preferably on a Sunday. So you can get some
>> idea of what the physical speed is.
>>
>>    -- Bob
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Joseph Workman <joseph.workman at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I really like ATT UVserve for res services. I get GREAT speeds and alot
>>> better service than I got from comcast.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Dan Pilcheck <pilcheck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey folks,
>>>>
>>>> I'm finally fed up with comcast enough to look around for alternate
>>>> ISPs, but it looks to be a sparse market for wired broadband.
>>>> (And not because of the latest DNS outage, their resolvers are way to
>>>> slow, anyways, imo.)
>>>>
>>>> I'm looking at /will be testing Clears (clear.com) 4G home service,
>>>> but I'm not expecting that to be up to par.
>>>> Ma Bell's U-verse is about the only thing I can see that can compare,
>>>> but if the price is reasonable to the speed
>>>> I'd prefer to give my money to some local/smaller provider.
>>>>
>>>> Does the Grand Rapids metro area have any other options!?!?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Who is to say that the next step in evolution is not a statistical
>>>> chance but rather a by-product of our own will?
>>>> That from here on out, nature stops deciding who survives and who
>>>> doesn't, but our own decisions?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>>>> believed to be clean.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> grlug mailing list
>>>> grlug at grlug.org
>>>> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joseph J. K. Workman
>>> Workman Technology Services
>>> 616.827.7570
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and
>>> is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> grlug mailing list
>>> grlug at grlug.org
>>> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
>>
>> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
>> grlug mailing list
>> grlug at grlug.org
>> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph J. K. Workman
> Workman Technology Services
> 616.827.7570
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> grlug mailing list
> grlug at grlug.org
> http://shinobu.grlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grlug
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://shinobu.grlug.org/pipermail/grlug/attachments/20101206/b52bc6ba/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the grlug mailing list